Economic Theories for Small Business Growth

Written By: Lance Piatt

Navigating today’s economic landscape as a small business owner is challenging. Bureaucratic demands, inflationary pressures, and economic volatility often create a business climate that can seem more like an adversary than an ally. Even more troubling is that much of this struggle is compounded by our own uncertainties about how the economy actually works. This complexity raises critical questions: What are we missing in our understanding of economic forces? What fundamental insights might help us make sense of sustainable growth?

Three economic schools of thought—Austrian, Supply-Side, and Keynesian—offer valuable yet distinct perspectives on what drives a healthy economy. While they all emphasize growth, they diverge sharply in their principles, policy recommendations, and beliefs about the role of government. By exploring these schools, small business owners can gain a deeper understanding of the forces shaping their world, but the Austrian approach, with its emphasis on individual choice and minimal intervention, is arguably the most promising—if difficult to fully realize.

Austrian Economics: Prioritizing Individual Choice and Market Integrity

Austrian Economics advocates for an economy that operates naturally, without government interference, and allows the actions of individuals to shape outcomes. It emphasizes that economic value comes from personal preferences and that real market signals—not artificial interventions—are crucial for sound economic health. Austrian principles argue for restrained government power, warning that when government meddles, it distorts true economic value and creates unsustainable cycles.

Core Concepts:
- Subjective Value: Value is determined by individual preferences, not by production costs or imposed supply-demand equations. True economic value emerges when consumers and businesses make choices freely.
- Business Cycle Theory: Austrians warn that central bank manipulation of interest rates and credit expansion disrupts natural market cycles, creating unsustainable booms followed by sharp busts.
- Economic Calculation: The Austrian view argues that central planning cannot allocate resources effectively because it lacks real market pricing, leading to inefficiency and waste.
Policy Implications: Austrian economics advocates for minimal government interference. Policies that inflate the money supply or artificially alter interest rates distort the market and, over time, destabilize the economy. Small business owners, by adhering to real market feedback, avoid being swept into the artificially induced cycles that Austrian economists criticize.

While Austrian economics may be challenging in a world where government intervention is common, it offers a principled foundation focused on true market freedom. Yet, achieving it fully is difficult due to human factors like greed and the appeal of short-term gain, which can drive demand for intervention.

Supply-Side Economics: Encouraging Production, But Opening the Door to Intervention

Supply-Side Economics takes a somewhat middle-ground approach, emphasizing the role of incentives in driving economic growth by increasing production. By advocating for lower taxes and reduced regulation, it promotes an environment where business production can thrive. However, supply-side policies also entertain some level of government intervention, a concession that risks opening the door to more extensive and intrusive policies, leading in time to a mixed economy that may ultimately drift into Keynesian-style intervention.

Core Concepts:
- Laffer Curve: Supply-side theory posits that tax cuts can spur economic growth by encouraging more work, investment, and productivity.
- Incentive to Produce: By reducing taxes and regulatory burdens, supply-side economics seeks to increase production, assuming that economic growth will “trickle down” and benefit the wider population.
Policy Implications: Supply-side policies are attractive to small business owners because they promote a reduction in taxes and regulations. However, the approach allows for a degree of government intervention—just enough to set a precedent. For instance, targeted tax cuts or incentives require government oversight, which can lead to further interventionist policies under different administrations or economic conditions.

In practice, while supply-side policies are useful in creating a business-friendly environment, the downside is that they create a foothold for more intrusive policies over time. This is the proverbial “camel under the tent”: once government intervention is accepted, it can be difficult to limit, and there is a risk that these measures could gradually evolve into the Keynesian policies supply-siders often seek to avoid.

Keynesian Economics: Intervention in the Name of Stability, With the Risk of Tyranny

Keynesian Economics, in contrast to Austrian and supply-side principles, openly advocates for government intervention, especially in times of economic downturns. Keynesian policies argue that the government should actively manage demand, increasing spending or cutting taxes during recessions to stimulate economic activity. Although this approach aims for stability, the long-term consequence of repeated intervention is often a drift toward dependency on government, with creeping controls over economic freedoms that Austrian economists would argue lead to socialism, or worse.

Core Concepts:
- Effective Demand: Keynes argued that economic downturns happen when demand is insufficient and that the government must intervene to restore demand levels.
- Multiplier Effect: Government spending can stimulate economic activity beyond its initial outlay, encouraging further economic activity in the private sector.
- Liquidity Preference: Keynesians advocate for active monetary policy to control interest rates, impacting investment and economic stability.
Policy Implications: Keynesians support counter-cyclical measures, where government boosts spending during recessions to offset reduced private demand. However, this intervention sets a precedent that, from an Austrian perspective, can lead to long-term dependency, inefficiency, and a distortion of economic reality.

Critics of Keynesian economics warn of the slippery slope: when governments regularly intervene to stabilize the economy, they risk creating dependency, inefficiency, and economic stagnation. Ultimately, repeated Keynesian intervention has the potential to erode market freedoms, paving the way for socialism through control over private enterprise and resources.

Balancing Theory with Practice: A Realistic Perspective for Small Business Owners

While the Austrian model of minimal intervention and maximum market freedom provides a principled foundation for economic health, achieving it completely is challenging in practice. Human behavior, especially under stress or in the pursuit of short-term gain, often gravitates toward calls for government intervention. Supply-side policies, though beneficial for reducing taxes and encouraging production, can introduce a “soft” form of intervention that grows over time, potentially spiraling into Keynesian-style economic management.

For small business owners, the practical takeaway is a balance of vigilance and adaptability:

Advocate for Market Freedom: The principles of Austrian economics—limited government, sound money, and free-market signals—offer a foundation that promotes economic stability and individual choice. Supporting policies that adhere to these ideals helps protect the autonomy of small businesses.
Recognize the Limits of Supply-Side Policies: While supply-side economics provides useful tools, particularly around tax cuts and deregulation, it also introduces a degree of government oversight that can grow over time. Small business owners should remain cautious and advocate for limits on these policies to prevent gradual encroachment.
Understand the Risks of Keynesian Intervention: While Keynesian policies may provide short-term relief during downturns, repeated intervention can lead to a dependency that undermines the principles of a free market. It’s essential to be aware of this risk and resist calls for intervention that could create long-term constraints on business freedom.

In conclusion, while the Austrian school offers the most resilient economic foundation for free enterprise, real-world complexities require small business owners to navigate a mixture of policies. By remaining informed and advocating for principles that prioritize market freedom, small business owners can make decisions that align with sustainable growth, avoiding the pitfalls of creeping intervention that may lead, ultimately, to a less free economic system.

Let Raven Business Coaching Help You Integrate for Success

At Raven Business Coaching, we understand the importance of choosing the right tools and making sure they work together. We’re here to help you map out your business systems, integrate the tools you need, and streamline your operations for growth.

What to do with what you have.

Ready to shine in the online sphere? Raven Business Coaching is here for you. Visit us at Raven Business Solutions – “run and not grow weary”.

Reference Links:

Explore our subscription plans today and take the first step toward building a stronger, more resilient business.

Raven Business Coaching: Crafting Small Business Success

At Raven Business Coaching, we understand the unique challenges faced by construction contractors, especially those operating as solo entrepreneurs. Our tailored subscription plans are designed to help you navigate these challenges and achieve long-term success.

Essential Business Subscription: This plan provides the foundational tools and guidance you need to manage your business effectively, improve client relations, and maintain a strong market presence.
Comprehensive Business Subscription: For contractors ready to take their business to the next level, this plan offers advanced strategies for scaling your operations, optimizing workflow, and maximizing profitability.

Peace on your Days

Lance